Litecoin founder Charlie Lee on Bancor security breach: An exchange is not decentralized if it can lose customer funds

Home » News » Litecoin founder Charlie Lee on Bancor security breach: An exchange is not decentralized if it can lose customer funds
July 10, 2018 by
Litecoin founder Charlie Lee on Bancor security breach: An exchange is not decentralized if it can lose customer funds

Decentralized cryptocurrency platform Bancor experienced a “safety breach” on July 9. The uploaded an official statement related to the safety and security violation which took place at around 00:00 UTC.

Bancor pointed out in the declaration that they are “dedicating every resource to fixing it”. The information of the breach are still being explored. Nevertheless, the important things which are validated are, a purse made use of to upgrade some smart contracts was endangered. The pocketbook was after that made use of to take out Ethereum token (ETH) worth $12.5 million from BNT clever contract. The hack came as a shock not only to the customers yet likewise to every person else in the crypto-verse. In fact, Litecoin creator, Charlie Lee also took a dig at the ‘decentralized’ pocketbook.

” A Bancor purse got hacked and that budget has the ability to steal coins from their very own wise contracts,” Lee tweeted. “An exchange is not decentralized if it could shed client funds or if it can ice up customer funds. Bancor can do BOTH. It’s a false feeling of decentralization.”
A twitter customer talked about his article discussing the difference between the exchange and the bnt token. “Bancor does not hold your symbols so could for that reason not freeze your funds. Bnt can be frozen as could many top erc20 symbols. It’s even considered a protection finest method by some.” The individual said, “The coins that were stolen really did not come from individuals. Bancor obtained its own funds swiped. Like if you ‘d have your own taken. Central to you. Likewise, the irony of this is that centralisation is just what in fact saved $12 mil bnt from being taken. It’s the eth that cannot be returned. [sic]

See also: Bancor Issues Security Breach Warning: Remains Down for Maintenance

Another customer mentioned how his statement is wrong claiming, “All ERC token makers can freeze their clever contracts or freeze a particular wallet if the sc created that way. Bancor is the makers of BNT token so they have full authority. [sic] The taken Ethereum token (ETH) is from Bancor’s very own purse, not users wallet. “So both of your statements are wrong,” the customer added.

Nonetheless, Bancor prepares to be back on-line within 24 Hr, CoinTelegraph reported. And also, Bancor’s main statement mentioned that after the theft was identified, they froze the taken BNT. However, Ethereum token (ETH) or other swiped token could not be frozen, so, they’re taking the help of other cryptocurrency exchanges to trace the taken tokens and make it difficult for the hacker to liquidate them. They have actually also assured claiming that no customer budgets have actually been jeopardized in the assault.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© Copyright 2018. Qryptoex. Designed by Space-Themes.com.